01
Site screening and go/no-go
Is this site worth an appraisal well? A ranked view of containment, capacity and injectivity risks from the data that already exists.
Due diligence · Storage risk · Climate finance
Subsurface risk, quantified before you commit capital.
Screening, uncertainty ranges, a monitoring plan and verification support: the evidence an investment committee needs before a go or no-go decision.
- Engagement types [VERIFY: confirm list]
- Screening, due diligence, MRV design
- Deliverable types [VERIFY: confirm list]
- Reports, datasets, monitoring plans
- Standards referenced Named once confirmed
- [VERIFY]
01 / Decisions we support
Four decisions, each with a stated range.
We start from the decision the work has to support, then scope the least analysis that can support it.
02
Storage capacity and uncertainty
Capacity reported as P90, P50 and P10 cases, with the inputs that drive the spread and the measurement that would narrow it.
03
Monitoring and verification (MRV) design
What to measure, how often, and whether each method can detect the predicted change at this site.
04
Carbon-credit technical evaluation
An independent check of the subsurface claims behind a carbon-credit project: storage, permanence and monitoring.
02 / What a deliverable looks like
Findings, figures and the range around them.
Both figures are illustrative examples built from synthetic data. They show the form of a deliverable, not a result.
| Time | P90, low (Mt CO2) | P50, mid (Mt CO2) | P10, high (Mt CO2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 5 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 4.7 |
| Year 10 | 3.9 | 5.9 | 8.9 |
| Year 20 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 15.0 |
| Year 30 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 15.0 |
Source: Illustrative values, not project data.
Sample deliverable (illustrative)
An illustrative extract showing how findings, uncertainty ranges and figures are reported. Not from a client project.
The current file is a labelled placeholder [VERIFY: final PDF from owner].
03 / Engagement process and timeline
Six steps to a report you can defend.
Durations are indicative and depend on data volume and access [VERIFY: all durations].
-
Scoping call
[VERIFY: duration]The decision, the deadline and the data available are agreed. -
Data review
[VERIFY: duration]Existing logs, core, tests and reports are checked for quality and gaps. -
Analysis
[VERIFY: duration]Interpretation and modelling, with uncertainty carried through. -
Draft
[VERIFY: duration]Draft findings and figures are issued for comment. -
Review
[VERIFY: duration]Your comments and the internal technical review are addressed. -
Final report
[VERIFY: duration]The signed-off report and datasets are handed over.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Data | Well logs, core and test data, seismic or other surveys, and previous reports. |
| Context | The decision to be made, its deadline, and the investment or regulatory test it must meet. |
| Access | A named technical contact and permission to use the data. |
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Report | Findings, methods and limitations, written for a technical reviewer and an investment committee. |
| Ranges | Key quantities as P90, P50 and P10 with the assumptions behind them. |
| Datasets | Interpreted curves and model inputs in open formats [VERIFY: formats]. |
| Scope, timeline and cost band | Agreed in writing before work starts [VERIFY: pricing approach]. |
Source: Deliverable checklist to be confirmed by the owner.
04 / Services
Services for investors and developers.
The five services, in the order investors and developers most often need them.
01
Carbon Storage & Climate
Screening, monitoring design and technical evaluation for CO2 storage, stated with the uncertainty a regulator or investor needs to see.
- CO2 storage screening
- MRV and monitoring strategy
- Carbon-credit technical evaluation
- CCU assessment
02
Borehole Logging & Interpretation
Wireline logging, petrophysics and core-log integration that turn a borehole into a calibrated record of the formations it crosses.
- Wireline logging
- Petrophysical interpretation
- Core-log integration
- Geophysical borehole studies
03
Climate Finance & Infrastructure Support
Independent technical evidence for investment decisions and renewable infrastructure: what the subsurface supports, and how sure that is.
- Technical due diligence
- Evidence for investment committees
- Renewable infrastructure support
04
Subsurface Resources
Resource evaluation for groundwater, basalt and geothermal wells, built on logged and tested data rather than surface inference alone.
- Groundwater assessment and monitoring
- Basalt resource assessment
- Geothermal well evaluation
05
Training & Curriculum Development
Courses and curricula in borehole logging, interpretation and carbon storage, built so that agency, industry and university teams can do the work themselves.
- Technical training courses
- Curriculum development
- Field and on-the-job training
- Training of trainers
05 / Methodology and independence
A method you can put in front of a committee.
We are paid for the analysis, not for the outcome. No result is guaranteed, and a no-go finding is reported as plainly as a go.
Full methodology-
Uncertainty
Inputs are given as ranges and carried through to the result; single-point estimates are not reported alone. -
Peer review
[VERIFY: review steps]Interpretations are checked by a second qualified reviewer before release. -
Data and QA
[VERIFY: QA procedure]Source data, corrections and parameter choices are recorded so the work can be audited and repeated. -
Conflicts of interest
[VERIFY: policy]Any interest in a project, sponsor or contractor is declared before work starts.
06 / Selected work
Selected work.
Only real, permitted case studies with quantified results are shown here. Until then this section holds a labelled placeholder [VERIFY].
Placeholder: project photograph
Basalt
Placeholder case study
Basalt carbon storage screening [VERIFY]
Placeholder case study. Screening of a basalt formation for CO2 storage using logged rock properties, a fluid-response framework and a monitoring sensitivity study.
07 / Team credentials
Who signs the report.
Short CVs, qualifications and memberships of the people responsible for the work [VERIFY: all profiles].
| Name | Role | Qualifications | Memberships |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team member 1 [VERIFY] | [VERIFY: role] | [VERIFY: degrees and professional registration] | [VERIFY: professional body] |
| Team member 2 [VERIFY] | [VERIFY: role] | [VERIFY: degrees and professional registration] | [VERIFY: professional body] |
| Team member 3 [VERIFY] | [VERIFY: role] | [VERIFY: degrees and professional registration] | [VERIFY: professional body] |
Source: Placeholder profiles; real names and qualifications to be supplied by the owner.
08 / Questions from investors
Scope, confidentiality and liability.
How is scope and pricing set?
After a scoping call we issue a written scope with a fixed deliverable list, a timeline and a cost band. Work starts once that is agreed [VERIFY: pricing approach].
How is our data kept confidential?
We work under a non-disclosure agreement where required. Project data is not shared or reused without written consent [VERIFY: NDA terms, storage and retention].
How fast can you turn work around?
It depends on data volume and quality. A screening review is the shortest engagement; indicative durations are given in the scope [VERIFY: typical durations].
Can your work be used for third-party verification?
Reports record data, method and assumptions so that a verifier or lender's technical adviser can follow and test them [VERIFY: verification bodies or standards worked with].
What about liability and independence?
We give a professional opinion on the evidence and do not guarantee project outcomes. Liability terms and insurance cover are set out in the engagement letter [VERIFY: liability cap and professional indemnity cover].
09 / Due-diligence scope
Request a technical due-diligence scope.
Tell us the decision, the deadline and the data you hold. We reply with a scope, a timeline and a cost band, or book a screening call first.