Placeholder case study
Basalt carbon storage screening [VERIFY]
Placeholder case study. Screening of a basalt formation for CO2 storage using logged rock properties, a fluid-response framework and a monitoring sensitivity study.
Service 02
Screening, monitoring design and technical evaluation for CO2 storage, stated with the uncertainty a regulator or investor needs to see.
01 / The problem
A carbon dioxide (CO2) storage project has to show three things: that there is enough pore space (capacity), that CO2 can be injected at the planned rate (injectivity), and that it will stay where it is put (containment). Each depends on subsurface properties that are known only within a range, and regulators, lenders and credit buyers all need to see that range.
02 / Approach
03 / CO2 storage screening
Screening is a desk study that uses what already exists. Its purpose is to stop weak sites early and to say what the next measurement should be.
04 / MRV and monitoring strategy
A monitoring method earns its place only if it can detect the predicted change at this site. The plan sets out what is measured, how often, and what result would trigger a response.
05 / Carbon-credit technical evaluation
An independent review of the subsurface claims behind a carbon-credit project: how much is stored, how permanently, and how that is being monitored. The review states what the evidence supports and what it does not [VERIFY: methodologies or registries worked with].
06 / CCU assessment
Technical screening of carbon capture and utilization (CCU) options where CO2 is used rather than, or as well as, stored [VERIFY: scope of CCU work offered].
07 / Deliverables
Each engagement ends with documents and data that can be filed, checked and reused.
08 / Tools and data
| Category | What is used |
|---|---|
| Characterization | Borehole logs, core analysis and well tests; see Borehole Logging & Interpretation |
| Static and dynamic modelling | Geological modelling and flow simulation software [VERIFY: packages used] |
| Uncertainty analysis | Monte Carlo sampling of input ranges and sensitivity analysis |
| Data | Well and core data, seismic or other geophysical surveys, regional geology and published analogues |
Source: Tool types and software categories only. Named products are added once confirmed by the owner.
09 / Sample figure
10 / Related case study
Case studies are published only with the client's agreement. Entries marked as placeholders show the structure, not a real project [VERIFY].
All projectsPlaceholder case study
Placeholder case study. Screening of a basalt formation for CO2 storage using logged rock properties, a fluid-response framework and a monitoring sensitivity study.
11 / Questions
Screening uses whatever exists. Sparse data gives a wide range rather than no answer, and the report says which measurement would narrow it most.
P90 is the low case, with a 90% probability of being exceeded; P50 is the mid case; P10 is the high case. Reports state the convention used [VERIFY: convention].
No. DeepSink provides the technical evaluation that a project developer, buyer or verifier can rely on; it does not issue or certify credits [VERIFY].
Yes. Basalt screening looks at the vesicular and fractured intervals, the confining flows between them and the water chemistry that controls mineralization [VERIFY: experience to cite].
12 / Other services
Wireline logging, petrophysics and core-log integration that turn a borehole into a calibrated record of the formations it crosses.
Resource evaluation for groundwater, basalt and geothermal wells, built on logged and tested data rather than surface inference alone.
Independent technical evidence for investment decisions and renewable infrastructure: what the subsurface supports, and how sure that is.
Courses and curricula in borehole logging, interpretation and carbon storage, built so that agency, industry and university teams can do the work themselves.
13 / Request a proposal
Tell us the decision the work has to support, the site or data you have, and any deadline.